Home-Schooling - An Action Research Journey Through Lockdown
Brief Description
An intimate look at one parent's systematic approach to homeschooling during COVID lockdown. Luke Warhurst transforms the challenge of teaching his two children into a structured research experiment, revealing powerful insights about learning, structure, and flexibility.
Summary
What happens when a parent approaches homeschooling like a researcher? During COVID lockdown, Luke Warhurst didn't just survive teaching his 8 and 10-year-old children at home – he turned it into a fascinating four-week experiment using action research methods.
From converting the playroom into a classroom to discovering the magic of "week three" flexibility, this episode chronicles his systematic journey through different teaching approaches. You'll hear how Montessori observation techniques revealed sibling distraction issues, why his daughter thrived with structure but rebelled against weekend work, and how his son chose routine even when given total freedom.
The breakthrough insight? Structure is essential for transition, but once children internalize learning expectations, flexibility becomes key. In just 18 minutes, discover practical lessons about differentiation, emotional well-being, and the delicate balance between guidance and autonomy that every parent and educator needs to hear.
-
[Speaker 2]
Okay, think about this scenario for a moment. The world suddenly grinds to a halt, schools are shut, and bam, you're not just a parent anymore, you're also the main teacher for your kids. That was the unexpected reality for so many people during the COVID lockdowns, a really daunting task.
[Speaker 1]
Absolutely.
[Speaker 2]
But what if you tackled that challenge, not just trying to survive it, but maybe with the curiosity of a researcher, you know, right there in your own home?
[Speaker 1]
That's a fascinating idea.
[Speaker 2]
Well, that's exactly where we're going in this deep dive. We're looking at the journey of one parent, Luke Warhurst, who found himself pretty suddenly the full-time teacher for his two primary school kids.
[Speaker 1]
A 10-year-old boy and an 8-year-old girl, right, during a long lockdown.
[Speaker 2]
Exactly. And instead of just reacting day to day, he turned it into this really personal, structured experiment.
[Speaker 1]
Yeah, what's pretty amazing is that Luke didn't just react, he was systematic about it. He actually framed the whole thing with a clear question in mind.
[Speaker 2]
Oh, really? What was it?
[Speaker 1]
Yeah. He basically asked himself, how can I create an effective homeschool learning environment and teaching schedule during an extended COVID-19 lockdown?
[Speaker 2]
Right.
[Speaker 1]
So it wasn't just about getting through it.
[Speaker 2]
Right.
[Speaker 1]
No, it was quite ambitious, really. He wanted to actually optimise their learning and their well-being, even with everything going on. He saw it as a chance to tailor their education and, you know, analyse his own effectiveness.
[Speaker 2]
That's quite a mindset shift. So his goals went way beyond just keeping them busy. He wanted to create the right environment, get a good schedule going, yes, but it sounds like it was deeper, identifying their needs, their strengths.
[Speaker 1]
And their emotional well-being, too. That was key.
[Speaker 2]
Yeah.
[Speaker 1]
Differentiating how he taught them and, importantly, helping them accept that this homeschooling was, you know, real school time.
[Speaker 2]
Getting them on board emotionally and intellectually.
[Speaker 1]
Precisely. And the method he used for this whole deep dive was something called action research. It's basically a practical way for anyone to investigate and evaluate their own work while they're doing it.
[Speaker 2]
Okay. So it's less about big, abstract theories. And more about finding what works for your specific situation, like for his family in their home during lockdown.
[Speaker 1]
Exactly. Unique solutions for unique problems. He even mentioned, funnily enough, that plumbers could use it.
It just shows how practical it is. A structured way to learn from what you're actually doing.
[Speaker 2]
Right. Learning by doing, but with a plan.
[Speaker 1]
You got it. Action research is like a cycle. You observe what's happening.
You reflect on it. Then you make a change. And then you evaluate how that change worked out.
[Speaker 2]
And then you modify and go again.
[Speaker 1]
Yep. Exactly. And Luke did this using, well, both numbers.
Like grades from assessments.
[Speaker 2]
Quantitative data.
[Speaker 1]
Right. And also qualitative stuff. His own observations.
Things the kids said in chats. Hearing them explain what they learned. And because he knew his kids so well, he could really interpret all that data.
Understand the why behind their reactions.
[Speaker 2]
That deep parental understanding must have been invaluable. And I bet there were benefits for him too, beyond just the kids learning right then.
[Speaker 1]
Oh, definitely. He felt it helped him build real teaching skills.
[Speaker 2]
Yeah.
[Speaker 1]
You know, managing behaviour, keeping them engaged, adapting lessons for each kid, understanding their emotional states.
[Speaker 2]
Skills that are useful anywhere.
[Speaker 1]
For sure. Plus just becoming more flexible, more adaptable, useful for any curveballs life throws at you.
[Speaker 2]
Okay. So he had this action research cycle going. But what specific teaching ideas did he draw on?
Did he look at existing methods?
[Speaker 1]
He did. Yeah. Even though things were pretty urgent, he selectively took some light inspiration, as he called it, from different established approaches.
Not to prove them right or wrong, but just to borrow useful bits.
[Speaker 2]
Practical takeaways.
[Speaker 1]
Exactly. So from Montessori, it wasn't just about the calm environment idea, though that was part of it. The big thing was observational assessment.
[Speaker 2]
Ah, so just watching closely.
[Speaker 1]
Yeah, really watching how his kids interacted with the learning space. That's how he spotted the sibling distraction issues so quickly. That observation became critical data.
He also liked the idea of kids working at their own pace, even if a full Montessori setup wasn't possible at home.
[Speaker 2]
Makes sense. What else?
[Speaker 1]
Then there was Steiner Waldorf. From that, he really focused on the importance of emotional development. Super important, especially with kids isolated during lockdown.
[Speaker 2]
Absolutely.
[Speaker 1]
So he made a conscious effort to prioritise how they were feeling, figuring that good learning would follow if they felt secure and happy.
[Speaker 2]
Putting well-being first.
[Speaker 1]
He also looked at Edward Harkness, the conference method, learning around a table, lots of discussion.
[Speaker 2]
Like a seminar?
[Speaker 1]
Kind of, yeah. He found it practical because it built on the trust they already had as parent and kids, turning it into a more teacher-student dialogue, open conversation.
[Speaker 2]
Leveraging that existing relationship.
[Speaker 1]
Exactly. And the Sudbury method, you know, the really extreme self-directed learning one.
[Speaker 2]
Right, where kids decide everything.
[Speaker 1]
Yeah. That was a bit too much for his situation with set curriculum work, but it did make him think hard about flexibility. It reinforced the idea that he needed to be ready to adjust the daily plan based on how the kids were doing, their motivation, their mood.
[Speaker 2]
So even if he didn't adopt it wholesale, it still influenced him.
[Speaker 1]
Definitely. And finally, John Holt. Holt had this really powerful idea that homeschooling can actually deepen the parent-child bond.
[Speaker 2]
Oh, interesting.
[Speaker 1]
Yeah. And that there's basically a negligible difference between being a parent and being an educator in that context. That took some pressure off Luke, feeling like he had to constantly switch hats.
[Speaker 2]
So he could just be himself, their dad, guiding their learning?
[Speaker 1]
Pretty much. Leverage that existing relationship to make learning productive and engaging.
[Speaker 2]
Okay. This is great context. Let's walk through the actual four weeks.
This is where we see the action research cycle, observe, reflect, act, evaluate really happening.
[Speaker 1]
Yeah. The rubber meeting the road.
[Speaker 2]
So week one, the formal start. He turned the playroom into a proper classroom, bookshelves, kid-sized furniture, the works.
[Speaker 1]
And a traditional five-day school schedule. Both kids doing the same subjects from the materials the school sent.
[Speaker 2]
And the goal here was what? Based on his initial thinking?
[Speaker 1]
The main goal was easing that transition, helping them emotionally and intellectually accept the shift like we talked about, making home feel like real school by mimicking the structure they knew.
[Speaker 2]
Okay. So that was the first action. What did he observe in week one that led to changes?
[Speaker 1]
Well, by week two, his observations, just watching them, showed a clear problem. They were distracting each other in that shared space.
[Speaker 2]
Ah, sibling dynamics, of course.
[Speaker 1]
Yep. So he reflected on that and then acted. He converted their computer room into a second learning spot.
[Speaker 2]
So they could work separately sometimes.
[Speaker 1]
Exactly. Sometimes apart, sometimes still together. The schedule stayed pretty similar, just tweaked slightly for the two rooms.
He thought maybe they hadn't quite grasped yet that home, normally playtime central, was now also for focus work.
[Speaker 2]
Right. That mental shift takes time. So on to week three.
What happened then? They were engaging better in week two, right?
[Speaker 1]
Engagement was better, yeah. But the feedback he got from them, his qualitative data, showed they were starting to resent how rigid the schedule felt. Too much pressure.
[Speaker 2]
Kids pushing back a bit.
[Speaker 1]
So he reflected again and acted again. He shifted to a six-day schedule.
[Speaker 2]
Six days.
[Speaker 1]
Wow. Oh wait, here's a twist. Less formal learning each day, shorter bursts, more playtime built in.
[Speaker 2]
Ah, okay. Trading intensity for duration.
[Speaker 1]
Exactly. And he deliberately didn't change the room setup that week. He wanted to isolate the impact of just the schedule change.
Less intense study days was the goal.
[Speaker 2]
Smart. Isolating the variable. And then week four.
Sounds like things got really different then.
[Speaker 1]
He really did. Based on his evaluations and ongoing observations, week four saw a big shift. Those dedicated learning rooms.
Mostly gone, except the computer room.
[Speaker 2]
Seriously. So where did they work?
[Speaker 1]
Whatever they wanted, basically. Kitchen table, their bedrooms, and the formal daily schedules replaced with weekly learning targets.
[Speaker 2]
Wow. That's a huge leap in autonomy.
[Speaker 1]
Huge. They got a lot more say in their own pace and the order they did things. The thinking was, look, as long as the work gets done by the end of the week, does it really matter where or exactly when?
[Speaker 2]
More trust. More flexibility. Okay, so those are the changes.
Now the results. How did the kids actually respond to all this week by week?
[Speaker 1]
This is where it gets really interesting, seeing their individual personalities come through. The analysis showed very different reactions.
[Speaker 2]
Let's hear it.
[Speaker 1]
Okay. Luke's eight-year-old daughter. Her performance actually peaked in week two.
[Speaker 2]
When they got separate spaces?
[Speaker 1]
Exactly. She seemed to thrive with that focused, independent time. But her performance tanked when the Saturday work started in week three.
Dad observed some real emotional resistance there.
[Speaker 2]
Didn't like giving up her weekend. I get that.
[Speaker 1]
Totally. And in week four, with the flexible targets, she powered through all her English work, her favourite subject right at the start of the week.
[Speaker 2]
Getting the best stuff done first.
[Speaker 1]
Yeah. But Luke wondered if that intense focus early on actually hurt her performance overall by the end of the week. Maybe needed more balance.
It showed how complex self-pacing can be.
[Speaker 2]
Fascinating. What about her brother? The ten-year-old.
[Speaker 1]
A completely different story. His ten-year-old son did best in week one.
[Speaker 2]
The really structured week.
[Speaker 1]
Yep. He responded well to that traditional routine initially. His lowest point was week two, interestingly.
Dad noted some suddy fatigue, even though he actually liked having his own space away from his sister.
[Speaker 2]
Huh. So the separate space wasn't the magic bullet for him.
[Speaker 1]
Not entirely. But then, surprisingly, week three, the lighter six-day schedule that actually renewed his energy and enthusiasm.
[Speaker 2]
Really? He was okay with the Saturday work.
[Speaker 1]
More okay than his sister, yeah. He seemed to understand the tradeoff. Lighter weekdays for a bit of weekend work.
And even in week four, with all that freedom, he often chose to stick close to a routine like week one's, spacing things out.
[Speaker 2]
He liked the structure even when he didn't have to have it.
[Speaker 1]
Kind of. Although, Dad observed he might have rushed his last tasks to get his weekend free. He was also older, more aware of the lockdown situation, upcoming exams.
That probably played a role in his initial focus, too.
[Speaker 2]
Wow. Okay. So pulling this all together, what are the big takeaways?
It sounds like week three had some magic in it.
[Speaker 1]
Yeah. The overall conclusion was that those week three changes, the lighter six-day week, with that mix of shared and separate work time, seemed to hit the sweet spot for both kids' engagement and performance. Most consistent positive impact.
[Speaker 2]
Right.
[Speaker 1]
But, and this is crucial, the findings suggest that initial structure, like in weeks one and two, is really important for that transition. Getting kids used to learning at home, when home, usually means something else.
[Speaker 2]
Easing them into it. Establishing that this is school now.
[Speaker 1]
Exactly. It helps bridge that gap.
[Speaker 2]
But then, and this is the really interesting part for me, once they've made that mental switch, the need for the super rigid classroom setup and schedule, actually, decreases.
[Speaker 1]
It seems so. It becomes less necessary once they've internalised the routine and expectations.
[Speaker 2]
And wasn't there something about alone time versus together time?
[Speaker 1]
Oh, yeah. A really subtle but important piece of feedback he got from them, just in casual chats, like on nature walks. They said they wondered about an equal amount of alone time and together time for their schoolwork.
[Speaker 2]
Even though they played together happily outside of school hours.
[Speaker 1]
Right. Which their dad found really interesting. And that desire actually influenced the move to separate spaces in week two.
And definitely fed into the flexibility of week four.
[Speaker 2]
So the bottom line is, structure is good, maybe even essential at the start.
[Speaker 1]
Yes. As a transitional tool.
[Speaker 2]
But the end goal should maybe be more flexible, more child-led, once they're settled, guiding them towards managing their own work patterns.
[Speaker 1]
That's what Luke concluded. Yeah. So, first off, structure to transition, then flexibility guided by the child's needs for the best results, engagement, performance, and just general happiness.
[Speaker 2]
And what about Luke himself? What did he take away from this whole intense experiment?
[Speaker 1]
Well, he definitely sharpened his skills in analysing data and seeing patterns. But maybe more importantly, he gained this really deep appreciation for how vital emotional and psychological well-being is for learning.
[Speaker 2]
It's not just about the academic tasks.
[Speaker 1]
Not at all. He realised, and I love this quote, that the differentiation of structure and schedule is almost as important as the differentiation of individual tasks. Tailoring the how and when matters as much as the what.
[Speaker 2]
That's powerful. Did he see any limitations?
[Speaker 1]
Oh, yeah. He was clear about that.
[Speaker 2]
Yeah.
[Speaker 1]
It was only four weeks, really short time. And he said it left him with as many questions as answers.
[Speaker 2]
Like what?
[Speaker 1]
Like, how would these ideas work in a formal school setting? With more kids, kids he doesn't know intimately like his own. Less flexibility.
Those are big questions.
[Speaker 2]
Translating this personal experiment to a wider context.
[Speaker 1]
Exactly. And that kind of brings up a question for all of us, doesn't it? Whether we're parents, teachers, or just trying to learn things ourselves.
[Speaker 2]
How can we be more intentional in our own lives?
[Speaker 1]
How can we consciously experiment with different structures, different approaches to boost engagement and well-being for ourselves or for people we're guiding?
[Speaker 2]
That's a great thought to end on. How can you, listening now, maybe adjust some structures in your own work, your learning, your family life, to find a better flow, better engagement, maybe even more happiness? Something to mull over.
[Speaker 1]
Definitely food for thought.
[Speaker 2]
Thank you for joining us for this really fascinating deep dive into one family's unique lockdown journey.